Examiner David L Robertson has allowed 24 of 25 decided applications (96%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
David L Robertson's public record spans 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 25 disposed applications, 24 were allowed and 1 was abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 96%. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work across both art units and reflects outcomes on decided applications only; pending applications are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation. The record represents past dispositions and is not predictive of outcomes on any individual application.
This pooled record aggregates dispositions across multiple art units within TC 2100. The 96% allowance rate describes historical outcomes on 25 decided applications and reflects the combined record, not performance in any single art unit. Aggregate figures describe the examiner's past record and are not predictions about any specific application. Detailed per-art-unit records appear in separate sections of this profile.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner David L Robertson has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 25 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP