Examiner David R Lazaro

What the data says.

David R Lazaro maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) across one art unit. Over 99 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 55 and abandoned 44, yielding an allowance rate of 56%. This rate describes the proportion of decided applications in the examiner's pooled history and is calculated from applications where a final decision was reached, excluding any pending matters. The record spans a single art unit within TC 2100.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates the examiner's work across all assigned art units. The allowance rate of 56% reflects historical outcomes across those units combined and describes past dispositions only. Aggregate figures do not predict outcomes in any specific application. To understand art-unit-specific patterns, consult the per-art-unit detail section. Pooled data provides a baseline view of the examiner's overall record.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Questions about Examiner David R Lazaro

• 01What is David R Lazaro's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 56%, based on 99 disposed applications (55 allowed, 44 abandoned). This figure describes historical decisions and is not a prediction of any specific application.
• 02How many art units does this examiner work in?

  The examiner's record spans one art unit within Technology Center 2100.
• 03What does the pooled allowance rate represent?

  The pooled rate combines all art units assigned to the examiner. It describes the proportion of decided applications that were allowed in the examiner's historical record and does not forecast outcomes in individual cases.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.