Examiner David V Luu has allowed 95 of 187 decided applications (51%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
David V Luu has a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 208 total applications, 187 have been disposed (allowed or abandoned). Of those 187 decided applications, 95 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 51%. The record spans one art unit. These figures represent the examiner's pooled historical record and describe decisions already made, not predictions about pending or future applications.
This pooled record aggregates all art units under the examiner's jurisdiction. The 51% allowance rate reflects past dispositions across 187 decided applications and describes the historical rate at which applications have been allowed. Aggregate figures do not predict outcomes in any individual application. Different art units may have different allowance rates; the pooled figure shows only the combined record across all assignments.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 123 decided applications with an interview and 64 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner David V Luu has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 208 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP