Examiner David Yiuk Jung has allowed 219 of 263 decided applications (83%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
David Yiuk Jung maintains a public record across 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 263 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 219 and abandoned 44, yielding an 83% allowance rate. This rate reflects the proportion of decided applications that were allowed relative to the total decided, and does not include pending cases. The pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work across both art units and describes the historical record without bearing on any individual application's outcome.
A pooled, cross-art-unit record aggregates statistics across multiple art units. The allowance rate shown here is the proportion of allowed decisions among all decided applications across those units combined. Aggregate historical figures describe the examiner's past record and are not predictions specific to any single application. Understanding the breadth of art units and the overall decided volume provides context for evaluating an examiner's body of work.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines network security, and computer and data security.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner David Yiuk Jung has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 263 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP