Examiner Dennis Y Myint has allowed 165 of 235 decided applications (70%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Dennis Y Myint maintains a public record across Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 235 disposed applications, the allowance rate stands at 70%, meaning 165 applications were allowed and 70 abandoned. The examiner works within a single art unit. This pooled figure reflects historical outcomes across all decided cases in the record and does not constitute a prediction for any individual application.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across one art unit. Pooled allowance rates describe past outcomes across all decided applications combined and reflect the aggregate result of examination in that art unit. Aggregate figures are historical summaries and are not predictions about any specific application or future prosecution outcomes.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 101 decided applications with an interview and 134 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Dennis Y Myint has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 235 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP