LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/DEVAN KAPOOR
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Devan Kapoor

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 10 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Devan Kapoor has allowed 1 of 10 decided applications (10%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

10% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Devan Kapoor maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across a pooled record spanning one art unit, the examiner has disposed of 10 applications. Of those 10 decided applications, 1 was allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 10%. The examiner's record encompasses 51 total applications filed, of which 9 have been abandoned. This pooled figure reflects the examiner's overall decisional history and does not constitute a prediction about any specific pending or future application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This examiner's record is pooled across art units within TC 2100, aggregating allowances and dispositions across those units. The allowance rate of 10% describes past decisions on 10 resolved applications and reflects the examiner's historical record only. Pooled figures do not account for art-unit variation and are not predictions of outcomes in any individual case or technology area.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2126
51 APPS · 10% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

10% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 63%
DISPOSITION1 / 9 / 41allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION34.6 moart unit avg 29.4 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY52.2 moart unit avg 44.4 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility96% · art unit 53%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)50%
§103 — Obviousness100% · art unit 88%
§112 — Written description & definiteness28%
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Devan Kapoor

  • What is Devan Kapoor's overall allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 10%, computed from 1 allowed application among 10 disposed (decided) applications in the pooled record.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    This pooled record spans one art unit: 2126, all within TC 2100.
  • How many applications has this examiner decided?
    The examiner has disposed of 10 applications total. Of 51 total applications filed, 9 have been abandoned and 1 has been allowed.
  • Does this allowance rate apply to my application?
    No. The 10% rate describes the examiner's historical record on decided cases and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Devan Kapoor has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 51 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP