Examiner Devan Kapoor has allowed 1 of 10 decided applications (10%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Devan Kapoor maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across a pooled record spanning one art unit, the examiner has disposed of 10 applications. Of those 10 decided applications, 1 was allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 10%. The examiner's record encompasses 51 total applications filed, of which 9 have been abandoned. This pooled figure reflects the examiner's overall decisional history and does not constitute a prediction about any specific pending or future application.
This examiner's record is pooled across art units within TC 2100, aggregating allowances and dispositions across those units. The allowance rate of 10% describes past decisions on 10 resolved applications and reflects the examiner's historical record only. Pooled figures do not account for art-unit variation and are not predictions of outcomes in any individual case or technology area.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Devan Kapoor has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 51 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP