Examiner Devayani R Talukdar has allowed 30 of 41 decided applications (73%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Devayani R Talukdar maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) across two art units. Over 41 disposed applications, the allowance rate stands at 73%. This rate reflects 30 allowed applications and 11 abandoned applications. The pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work across both art units and represents the examiner's historical record of allowances among decided cases. This percentage describes past dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application outcome.
A pooled, cross-art-unit record aggregates disposal data from multiple art units into a single allowance-rate figure. That figure describes the examiner's historical rate of allowances among all decided applications across those units combined. The aggregate rate is a statistical summary of past dispositions and does not predict the outcome of any individual application or reflect the characteristics of any single art unit.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Based on 24 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Based on 17 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Devayani R Talukdar has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 41 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP