LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/DEVIN E ALMEIDA
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Devin E Almeida

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 42 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JAN 2009
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Devin E Almeida has allowed 17 of 42 decided applications (40%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

40% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Devin E Almeida maintains a public record of 42 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of those decided applications, 17 were allowed and 25 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 40%. The examiner's record spans a single art unit. This pooled figure represents the overall allowance rate across all art units in which the examiner has issued decisions. The allowance rate is calculated only from decided applications and excludes any pending matters.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all of the examiner's decided applications across their assigned art unit(s). The allowance rate of 40% describes the historical share of allowed applications among all decided cases and is a summary of past dispositions. Aggregate statistics across art units do not constitute a prediction for any specific application. Each art unit may have distinct substantive standards, claim complexity, and applicant populations. The pooled figure is descriptive of the overall record only.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2132
42 APPS · 40% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

40% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION17 / 25 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION37.8 moart unit avg 27.4 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY48.4 moart unit avg 41 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Devin E Almeida

  • What is Devin E Almeida's overall allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 40%, based on 42 disposed applications in TC 2100 (17 allowed, 25 abandoned). This rate describes past decisions and is not a prediction of any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The examiner's public record spans 1 art unit (Art Unit 2132) within Technology Center 2100.
  • What does the pooled allowance rate include?
    The 40% rate is calculated from all decided (disposed) applications—allowed and abandoned cases combined—across the examiner's assigned art unit(s). Pending applications are excluded. This is an aggregate figure and does not forecast the outcome of any individual application.
  • Can I use this allowance rate to predict my application's outcome?
    No. The pooled allowance rate describes the examiner's past record only and is not a prediction for any specific application. Many factors specific to each case affect examination outcome.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Devin E Almeida has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 42 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP