Examiner Devin E Almeida has allowed 17 of 42 decided applications (40%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Devin E Almeida maintains a public record of 42 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of those decided applications, 17 were allowed and 25 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 40%. The examiner's record spans a single art unit. This pooled figure represents the overall allowance rate across all art units in which the examiner has issued decisions. The allowance rate is calculated only from decided applications and excludes any pending matters.
This pooled record aggregates all of the examiner's decided applications across their assigned art unit(s). The allowance rate of 40% describes the historical share of allowed applications among all decided cases and is a summary of past dispositions. Aggregate statistics across art units do not constitute a prediction for any specific application. Each art unit may have distinct substantive standards, claim complexity, and applicant populations. The pooled figure is descriptive of the overall record only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Devin E Almeida has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 42 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP