Examiner Dhairya A Patel has allowed 13 of 47 decided applications (28%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Dhairya A Patel maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 47 disposed applications, 13 were allowed and 34 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 28% over the decided applications. The examiner's practice spans a single art unit within TC 2100. This pooled record reflects outcomes across all applications decided by this examiner in the technology center and does not represent a prediction for any individual application.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across all art units in which they work. The allowance rate shown—28%—describes historical outcomes across decided applications and reflects the composition of all cases handled. Pooled figures encompass multiple art units and do not forecast results on any specific application. Individual art-unit data, where available separately, may show variation from the overall pooled rate.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Dhairya A Patel has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 47 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP