Examiner Diane D Mizrahi has allowed 339 of 388 decided applications (87%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Diane D Mizrahi holds a public record across 3 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 388 disposed applications, 339 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 87%. The allowance rate ranges from 87% to 88% across the examiner's art units. This pooled record represents the aggregate of examination activity across art units 2165, 2171, and 2175. The figure of 87% describes past dispositions and is not a prediction of outcome for any specific application.
This pooled record aggregates examination data across multiple art units within TC 2100, combining applications from different subject areas under the technology center's umbrella. The 87% allowance rate and the 87%–88% range across art units describe historical disposal patterns, not forecasts. Pooled figures mask variation among individual art units. Each applicant's case is distinct, and historical rates are correlational summaries, not predictive models for individual applications.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 123 decided applications with an interview and 141 without.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Diane D Mizrahi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 388 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP