Examiner Diedra M Mcquitery has allowed 352 of 448 decided applications (79%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Diedra M Mcquitery maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). The examiner has handled 474 total applications across art unit 2166. Of 448 disposed applications, 352 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 79%. Ninety-six applications were abandoned. This pooled record reflects outcomes across all art units within the examiner's jurisdiction and describes historical disposition data only.
This record aggregates all art units under the examiner's purview and presents pooled statistics from past dispositions. The allowance rate reflects the share of decided cases (allowed plus abandoned) that resulted in allowance. These figures describe the examiner's historical record and are not predictive of outcomes in any specific pending application. Pooled data masks variation across individual art units.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 213 decided applications with an interview and 235 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Diedra M Mcquitery has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 474 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP