Examiner Dieu Minh T Le has allowed 923 of 1,002 decided applications (92%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Dieu Minh T Le maintains a public record spanning two art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 1,002 disposed applications, 923 were allowed and 79 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 92%. This rate is computed from decided applications only—applications pending at the record cutoff are excluded. The examiner's pooled record reflects work across art units 2114 and 2184.
This pooled record aggregates two art units and reflects historical dispositions. The 92% allowance rate describes past outcomes across decided applications and is not predictive of any specific application's outcome. Aggregate figures smooth variations that may exist within individual art units. Applicants consulting this examiner's per-art-unit record will find detail specific to each art unit; the pooled figure here provides an overview of the overall disposition pattern.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 348 decided applications with an interview and 648 without.
Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Dieu Minh T Le has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,002 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP