Examiner Dinku W Gebresenbet has allowed 465 of 652 decided applications (71%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Dinku W Gebresenbet maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 675 total applications, 465 have been allowed and 187 abandoned, for a decided count of 652 applications. The allowance rate over disposed applications is 71%. The examiner's record spans one art unit (2164). This pooled figure represents the aggregate outcome across all applications in the examiner's jurisdiction and describes the historical record only.
A pooled record aggregates outcomes across all art units under an examiner's purview. The allowance rate presented here is a historical measure—the ratio of allowed to decided applications—and does not predict the outcome of any specific application. Different art units may exhibit different characteristics. Aggregate figures describe what occurred in the past and are not forecasts for individual cases.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 375 decided applications with an interview and 277 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Dinku W Gebresenbet has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 675 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP