Examiner Dino Kujundzic has allowed 274 of 409 decided applications (67%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Dino Kujundzic maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 409 disposed applications, 274 were allowed and 135 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 67%. The examiner's record spans a single art unit. This pooled figure represents the aggregate outcome of decided cases and does not constitute a prediction for any individual application.
A pooled record aggregates data across all art units under an examiner's jurisdiction. The allowance rate shown here—67% over 409 disposed applications—reflects historical outcomes across that full scope. Such aggregate figures describe past performance and are not predictions about specific applications. Individual art units may show different patterns; pooled data provides a high-level overview only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 210 decided applications with an interview and 199 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Dino Kujundzic has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 409 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP