Examiner Dipakkumar B Gandhi has allowed 732 of 887 decided applications (83%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Dipakkumar B Gandhi maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning 4 art units. Across 887 disposed applications, 732 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 83%. The allowance rate ranges from 78% to 92% across these art units, reflecting variation in outcomes by technology area within TC 2100. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's activity across distinct subject-matter groups and does not represent performance on any single application or art unit.
This record is a pool—a sum of outcomes across 4 separate art units within TC 2100. The 83% allowance rate describes past dispositions on 887 decided applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Allowance rates vary by art unit (78% to 92%), so this aggregate figure masks that variation. A pooled record shows breadth of experience but does not forecast results in any particular technology area or case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines control or regulating systems.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 198 decided applications with an interview and 288 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 138 decided applications with an interview and 124 without.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 22 decided applications with an interview and 49 without.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 17 decided applications with an interview and 51 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Dipakkumar B Gandhi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 887 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP