Examiner Djenane M Bayard has allowed 53 of 99 decided applications (54%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Djenane M Bayard maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 99 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 53 and abandoned 46, yielding an allowance rate of 54%. The examiner's record spans one art unit. This pooled allowance rate reflects the overall share of decided applications that issued as patents, aggregated across the examiner's assigned art units. The figure represents past dispositions and does not indicate the outcome of any individual pending application.
This record aggregates decisions across one art unit within TC 2100. The allowance rate (54%) is a historical average of allowed applications divided by all decided applications—allowed plus abandoned—and excludes pending cases. Pooled figures describe the examiner's past record in aggregate form. Aggregate allowance rates are not predictions of outcomes on any specific application and do not account for differences in application complexity, claim scope, or prior-art strength.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 33 decided applications with an interview and 66 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Djenane M Bayard has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 99 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP