Examiner Dohm Chankong has allowed 59 of 136 decided applications (43%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Dohm Chankong maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 136 disposed applications, 59 were allowed and 77 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 43 percent. This figure reflects the examiner's record on decided cases only and excludes any pending applications. The examiner's work spans a single art unit, pooling all examination activity within that unit into a unified profile.
A pooled record aggregates examination activity across all art units assigned to an examiner. The allowance rate of 43 percent describes the historical share of decided applications that were allowed, calculated as allowed divided by disposed (allowed plus abandoned). This figure is a summary of past outcomes and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled data masks variation among individual art units.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 76 decided applications with an interview and 60 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Dohm Chankong has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 136 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP