Examiner Doon Y Chow has allowed 1 of 54 decided applications (2%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Doon Y Chow maintains a public record spanning 3 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 54 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 1 application and abandoned 53, yielding an allowance rate of 2 percent. This rate is calculated as the percentage of decided cases—allowed plus abandoned—and excludes any pending applications. The pooled figure aggregates the examiner's activity across all assigned art units.
This pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units and represents the examiner's historical record only. The overall allowance rate describes past dispositions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures mask variation among individual art units; each art unit maintains its own separate record. When reviewing an examiner's profile, distinguish between aggregate statistics and per-unit performance to understand the full picture.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Based on 45 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Based on 4 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Doon Y Chow has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 54 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP