Examiner Douglas M Shute has allowed 15 of 24 decided applications (63%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Douglas M Shute holds a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning a single art unit. Across 24 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 15 and abandoned 9, yielding an allowance rate of 63%. This rate reflects the proportion of decided cases and does not represent a prediction for any individual application. The record aggregates all activity within the examiner's assigned art unit and presents the historical outcome distribution without characterization of examination patterns or future case outcomes.
A pooled record aggregates results across all art units assigned to an examiner and presents them as a single figure. The allowance rate—the percentage of allowed applications among all decided cases—is a historical aggregate. This statistic describes past outcomes only and is not a prediction about any specific pending or future application. Individual cases present distinct claim sets, prior art, and prosecution histories that are not captured in pooled figures.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Douglas M Shute has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 24 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP