LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/DOUGLAS M SHUTE
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Douglas M Shute

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 24 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION OCT 2005
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Douglas M Shute has allowed 15 of 24 decided applications (63%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

63% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Douglas M Shute holds a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning a single art unit. Across 24 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 15 and abandoned 9, yielding an allowance rate of 63%. This rate reflects the proportion of decided cases and does not represent a prediction for any individual application. The record aggregates all activity within the examiner's assigned art unit and presents the historical outcome distribution without characterization of examination patterns or future case outcomes.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates results across all art units assigned to an examiner and presents them as a single figure. The allowance rate—the percentage of allowed applications among all decided cases—is a historical aggregate. This statistic describes past outcomes only and is not a prediction about any specific pending or future application. Individual cases present distinct claim sets, prior art, and prosecution histories that are not captured in pooled figures.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2121
24 APPS · 63% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

63% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 57%
DISPOSITION15 / 9 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION27.8 moart unit avg 27 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY36.1 moart unit avg 39.9 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Douglas M Shute

  • What is Douglas M Shute's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 63%, based on 24 disposed applications (15 allowed, 9 abandoned). This is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction for any individual application.
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    This pooled record covers 1 art unit (Art Unit 2121) within TC 2100.
  • What does the allowance rate include?
    The allowance rate is the percentage of allowed applications among all decided (disposed) cases. It excludes pending applications and describes historical outcomes only.
  • Does this record predict outcomes for my application?
    No. Pooled historical figures describe past dispositions and are not predictions. Each application is evaluated on its own facts, claims, and prior art.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Douglas M Shute has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 24 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP