Examiner Duc T Doan has allowed 593 of 722 decided applications (82%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Duc T Doan has a public record of 722 disposed applications across 3 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of these decided applications, 593 were allowed and 129 abandoned, yielding an overall allowance rate of 82%. The allowance rate across the examiner's art units ranges from 80% to 83%. This pooled figure represents the aggregate outcome of applications decided in art units 2135, 2185, and 2188 and does not represent a prediction for any individual application.
A pooled record aggregates dispositions across multiple art units, each handling distinct subject matter within TC 2100. The overall allowance rate—here, 82%—is a historical summary of all decided applications and reflects past outcomes only. The range (80% to 83%) shows variation among individual art units but does not predict the outcome of any specific application. Pooled statistics describe what occurred; they are not forecasts.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 50 decided applications with an interview and 270 without.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 52 decided applications with an interview and 165 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 32 decided applications with an interview and 153 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Duc T Doan has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 722 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP