Examiner Dung C Dinh

What the data says.

Examiner Dung C Dinh maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across a pooled span of 2 art units, the examiner has disposed of 40 applications. Of those 40 decided applications, 29 were allowed and 11 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 73%. This rate reflects the proportion of allowed applications among all disposed cases in the examiner's record and does not forecast outcomes on any pending or future application.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates data from multiple art units within TC 2100 and presents overall statistics from the examiner's past decisions. The 73% allowance rate describes historical outcomes across all disposed applications in those units combined. Aggregate figures reflect what has occurred, not what will occur on any individual case. Per-art-unit breakdowns, where available, may show variation from the overall pooled rate.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Questions about Examiner Dung C Dinh

• 01What is Examiner Dinh's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 73%, calculated from 29 allowed applications out of 40 total disposed applications in the pooled record across all art units.
• 02How many art units does this examiner work in?

  Examiner Dinh's record spans 2 art units (2152 and 2153) within Technology Center 2100.
• 03Does this pooled rate apply to my specific application?

  No. The 73% rate describes past decisions across multiple art units and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual results vary based on claim content, prior art, and prosecution history.
• 04What does 'disposed' mean in this record?

  Disposed applications are those that have reached a final decision—either allowed or abandoned. The figure excludes pending applications and does not represent all filings ever made to the examiner.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.