LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/DUNG K CHAU
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Dung K Chau

TECH CENTER 2100 · 3 ART UNITS · 497 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION MAY 2023
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 3 ART UNITS

Examiner Dung K Chau has allowed 425 of 497 decided applications (86%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

86% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2153 · 96%AU 2169 · 68%AU 2161 · 14%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Dung K Chau has disposed of 497 applications across three art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of those decided applications, 425 were allowed and 72 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 86%. The examiner's record spans art units 2153, 2161, and 2169. The allowance rate ranges from 68% to 96% across these art units, reflecting variation in outcomes within the examiner's pooled portfolio.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates the examiner's work across multiple art units within TC 2100. The overall allowance rate of 86% describes historical decisions on 497 disposed applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Variation across individual art units (68% to 96%) illustrates that results differ by art unit. The pooled figure serves as a general reference to the examiner's past record only.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2153
323 APPS · 96% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

96% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 57%
DISPOSITION310 / 13 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION20 moart unit avg 27.7 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY27.7 moart unit avg 41.6 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility33% · art unit 54%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)71%
§103 — Obviousness35% · art unit 77%
§112 — Written description & definiteness18%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW99%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW94%+5 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 147 decided applications with an interview and 176 without.

ART UNIT 2169
167 APPS · 68% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

68% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 47%
DISPOSITION114 / 53 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION24 moart unit avg 24.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY49.5 moart unit avg 40 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility37% · art unit 57%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)72%
§103 — Obviousness67% · art unit 88%
§112 — Written description & definiteness29%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW86%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW41%+45 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 101 decided applications with an interview and 66 without.

ART UNIT 2161
7 APPS · 14% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

14% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 62%
DISPOSITION1 / 6 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION30.8 moart unit avg 23.1 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY39.3 moart unit avg 39 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Dung K Chau

  • What is Examiner Chau's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 86%, based on 425 allowed applications and 72 abandoned applications out of 497 total disposed applications.
  • How many art units does Examiner Chau cover?
    Examiner Chau has a record in three art units (2153, 2161, and 2169) within Technology Center 2100.
  • What is the range of allowance rates across Examiner Chau's art units?
    The allowance rate ranges from 68% to 96% across the examiner's art units, indicating variation in outcomes by art unit.
  • What does the pooled record represent?
    The pooled record aggregates decisions across all three art units and describes the examiner's historical outcomes. It is not a prediction of any specific application.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Dung K Chau has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 497 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP