Examiner Dustin Nguyen has allowed 62 of 130 decided applications (48%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Dustin Nguyen maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across one art unit, the examiner has disposed of 130 applications, consisting of 62 allowed and 68 abandoned applications. The overall allowance rate is 48% over the 130 decided applications. This rate represents the pooled record across all art units in which the examiner has been active and describes the historical disposition pattern in the examiner's caseload.
This record aggregates applications across all art units in which the examiner works. The 48% allowance rate is computed from decided applications only—allowed plus abandoned—and excludes any pending cases. Pooled figures describe the examiner's past record across multiple art units and do not function as predictions for any specific application. Individual art-unit data may show different patterns and is available in a separate section.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Dustin Nguyen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 130 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP