Examiner Duyen My Doan has allowed 44 of 87 decided applications (51%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Duyen My Doan has disposed of 87 applications across two art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of the 87 disposed applications, 44 were allowed and 43 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 51% over the decided record. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work across art units 2143 and 2152. The record reflects the examiner's public history in this technology center and does not constitute a prediction for any future application.
This record is pooled across multiple art units, meaning it combines the examiner's decisions in different subject-matter groups within TC 2100. Aggregate allowance rates describe historical outcomes and do not predict results on any individual application. The allowance rate is computed as a share of decided (disposed) applications only—it excludes pending cases. Understanding a pooled record requires recognizing that it reflects cumulative experience across distinct art units rather than performance in a single specialty.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 46 decided applications with an interview and 25 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Duyen My Doan has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 87 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP