Examiner Earl L Elias has allowed 64 of 109 decided applications (59%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Earl L Elias maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 134 total applications, 109 have been disposed of (allowed or abandoned). Of those 109 decided applications, 64 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 59%. The examiner's record spans a single art unit (2169). This pooled figure represents the overall allowance rate across all art units in which the examiner has issued decisions and reflects only applications that have been decided; pending applications are not included in the allowance-rate calculation.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across all assigned art units into a single pooled allowance rate. The 59% figure describes past decisions on 109 disposed applications and is not a prediction about any specific application. Pooled records combine different subject areas and prosecution patterns. Understanding that this is historical data across multiple units helps contextualize any single application's prosecution.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 63 decided applications with an interview and 46 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Earl L Elias has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 134 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP