LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/EARL L ELIAS
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Earl L Elias

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 109 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Earl L Elias has allowed 64 of 109 decided applications (59%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

59% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Earl L Elias maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 134 total applications, 109 have been disposed of (allowed or abandoned). Of those 109 decided applications, 64 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 59%. The examiner's record spans a single art unit (2169). This pooled figure represents the overall allowance rate across all art units in which the examiner has issued decisions and reflects only applications that have been decided; pending applications are not included in the allowance-rate calculation.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This profile aggregates the examiner's record across all assigned art units into a single pooled allowance rate. The 59% figure describes past decisions on 109 disposed applications and is not a prediction about any specific application. Pooled records combine different subject areas and prosecution patterns. Understanding that this is historical data across multiple units helps contextualize any single application's prosecution.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2169
134 APPS · 59% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

59% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 47%
DISPOSITION64 / 45 / 25allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION19.1 moart unit avg 24.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY40.7 moart unit avg 40 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility71% · art unit 57%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)89%
§103 — Obviousness99% · art unit 88%
§112 — Written description & definiteness57%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW67%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW48%+19 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 63 decided applications with an interview and 46 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Earl L Elias

  • What is Earl L Elias's overall allowance rate?
    The overall allowance rate is 59%, based on 64 allowed applications out of 109 decided (disposed) applications. This is pooled across all art units and reflects past decisions only—not a prediction for any pending or future application.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    Earl L Elias's record spans one art unit (2169) in Technology Center 2100. The pooled figures shown here aggregate the examiner's complete record across all assigned art units.
  • What is the total number of applications in this record?
    The examiner has handled 134 total applications. Of these, 109 have been disposed of (allowed or abandoned), and the allowance rate is calculated from those 109 decided applications only. Pending applications are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation.
  • Does this allowance rate predict the outcome of my application?
    No. This pooled historical rate describes past decisions and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual applications are examined on their merits under the applicable statutes and rejections.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Earl L Elias has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 134 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP