Examiner Eddy Cheung has allowed 360 of 410 decided applications (88%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Eddy Cheung's public record spans one art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 410 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 88%. This pooled figure represents all decided cases—allowed and abandoned combined—from the examiner's practice in TC 2100. The record covers 420 total applications, of which 360 were allowed and 50 were abandoned. This snapshot reflects historical disposition data and does not forecast outcomes for individual pending or future applications.
This pooled record aggregates applications across all art units in which the examiner has decided cases. The 88% allowance rate describes past dispositions (allowed plus abandoned) divided by all decided applications. Pooled figures mask variation within and across art units. An aggregate rate is a historical summary and is not a prediction of the outcome of any specific application currently pending or future filing.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 180 decided applications with an interview and 230 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Eddy Cheung has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 420 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP