Examiner Edmund H Kwong has allowed 328 of 377 decided applications (87%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Edmund H Kwong maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning two art units. Across 377 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 87%, calculated from 328 allowed applications and 49 abandoned applications. The record covers a total of 403 applications filed. This pooled figure aggregates outcomes across both art units and reflects historical disposition data only, without bearing on any specific pending or future application.
A pooled record combines statistics from multiple art units into a single aggregate. This examiner's 87% allowance rate describes outcomes already decided across both art units in TC 2100, based on 377 disposed applications. Pooled figures characterize past record only and are not predictive of outcomes in any individual application. Art-unit-level detail, where available separately, may show variation within the aggregate.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 191 decided applications with an interview and 185 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Edmund H Kwong has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 403 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP