Examiner Edward Wang has allowed 103 of 133 decided applications (77%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Edward Wang maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 133 disposed applications, he allowed 103 and abandoned 30, for an allowance rate of 77%. His practice spans a single art unit. This record reflects outcomes on applications that have been decided; it does not include pending matters and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
This pooled record aggregates the examiner's work across all art units in which he operates. The allowance rate of 77% describes historical disposal outcomes and reflects the share of decided applications that were allowed. Aggregate figures characterize the past record only and are not predictive of any individual application. Per-art-unit detail, where available, may appear separately.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 41 decided applications with an interview and 92 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Edward Wang has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 133 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP