Examiner Elias Mamo has allowed 960 of 1,132 decided applications (85%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Elias Mamo maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning a single art unit. Across 1,132 decided applications, the examiner has issued allowances in 960 cases, yielding an 85% allowance rate. The record encompasses 1,168 total applications, with 172 abandonments. This pooled figure represents the examiner's overall allowance rate across the art units in their jurisdiction and is a historical record of dispositions already completed.
This examiner's record aggregates all art units within their jurisdiction into a single pooled allowance rate. The 85% figure reflects past decisions across decided applications and does not predict the outcome of any specific application. Pooled data masks variation across individual art units; applicants may review per-art-unit breakdowns separately to understand performance in their particular classification. These figures are descriptive of prior work only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 253 decided applications with an interview and 879 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Elias Mamo has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,168 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP