Examiner Eliyah Stone Harper has allowed 753 of 990 decided applications (76%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Eliyah Stone Harper maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning one art unit. Across 990 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 753 and abandoned 237, for an overall allowance rate of 76%. The record covers 1,019 total applications filed. These figures represent the examiner's pooled history and are factual summaries of past decisions, not predictions about any specific application.
This pooled record aggregates data across one art unit. The 76% allowance rate describes the share of decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) in the examiner's past work. Pooled figures describe historical output and do not forecast the outcome of any individual case. Different art units may have different profiles; this summary reflects the combined record only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 392 decided applications with an interview and 598 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Eliyah Stone Harper has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,019 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP