Examiner Elizabeth G Wright has allowed 21 of 94 decided applications (22%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Elizabeth G Wright holds a public record across three art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 94 disposed applications, she allowed 21 and abandoned 73, yielding an allowance rate of 22%. This rate reflects decisions on applications that have been fully resolved. The pooled figure spans art units 2172, 2175, and 2176 and represents her aggregate record across this subject-matter area. This statistic is a historical summary of past dispositions and does not forecast outcomes in any particular case.
A pooled record aggregates outcomes across multiple art units into a single overall allowance rate. This aggregate figure summarizes past dispositions but is not a prediction of how any future application will be examined. The allowance rate describes what has occurred on decided applications; it does not indicate how an examiner will treat a specific case. Pooled data obscures variation between individual art units and is most useful for understanding broad patterns across an examiner's practice.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 38 decided applications with an interview and 30 without.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Based on 19 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Elizabeth G Wright has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 94 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP