Examiner Elmira Mehrmanesh has allowed 698 of 838 decided applications (83%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Elmira Mehrmanesh maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 866 total applications, 838 applications have been decided. Of those 838 decided applications, 698 were allowed and 140 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 83%. The examiner's record spans one art unit. This pooled figure reflects outcomes across all work in that art unit and is a summary of past dispositions, not a forecast for any individual application.
This record is pooled across all art units assigned to the examiner. Pooled allowance rates combine outcomes from different art units and reflect aggregate historical data. The 83% figure describes the proportion of decided applications that were allowed over the examiner's entire record. Aggregate statistics characterize past outcomes and do not predict the outcome of any specific pending application.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 294 decided applications with an interview and 544 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Elmira Mehrmanesh has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 866 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP