LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/EMANUEL T VOELTZ
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Emanuel T Voeltz

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 32 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION FEB 2005
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Emanuel T Voeltz has allowed 28 of 32 decided applications (88%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

88% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Emanuel T Voeltz has a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 32 disposed applications, 28 were allowed and 4 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 88%. This rate is calculated from decided applications only and excludes any pending filings. The examiner's record spans a single art unit within TC 2100. The figures presented reflect the examiner's historical disposition record and do not constitute a prediction for any specific application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates data across all art units in which the examiner works. The 88% allowance rate describes past decisions on 32 applications that have been disposed (allowed or abandoned). Aggregate figures reflect historical performance and are not predictions about the outcome of any particular application. Individual art units may exhibit different patterns; separate per-art-unit data provides additional detail.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2121
32 APPS · 88% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

88% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 57%
DISPOSITION28 / 4 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION25.9 moart unit avg 27 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY34.6 moart unit avg 39.9 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Emanuel T Voeltz

  • What is Emanuel T Voeltz's allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 88%, calculated from 28 allowed applications and 4 abandoned applications out of 32 total disposed applications. This figure is a summary of past decisions and is not a prediction for any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The examiner's pooled record spans 1 art unit within Technology Center 2100.
  • What does the allowance rate include?
    The allowance rate is the percentage of decided (disposed) applications only—allowed plus abandoned—and excludes pending applications. It is calculated from 32 disposed applications in this examiner's record.
  • What subject matter does this examiner work on?
    The examiner works in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Emanuel T Voeltz has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 32 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP