LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/EMILIO ALCANTARA-RAMOS
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Emilio Alcantara-Ramos

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 11 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Emilio Alcantara-Ramos has allowed 7 of 11 decided applications (64%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

64% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Emilio Alcantara-Ramos maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), covering one art unit. His pooled record spans 42 total applications, of which 11 have been disposed. Among those 11 decided applications, 7 were allowed and 4 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 64% across the disposed count. This allowance rate reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final resolution and does not include pending cases.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates data across all art units handled by an examiner. The allowance rate shown—64% here—describes the examiner's historical decided applications and is not a prediction about any specific application. Aggregate figures obscure variations by art unit, subject matter, or case type. The disposed count (11 applications) represents the decided population on which the allowance rate is based; pending applications are excluded from this calculation.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2183
42 APPS · 64% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines program control and execution.

64% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION7 / 4 / 31allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION22.5 moart unit avg 25 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY33.5 moart unit avg 40.1 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility40% · art unit 34%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)73%
§103 — Obviousness87% · art unit 79%
§112 — Written description & definiteness90%

Based on 42 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Emilio Alcantara-Ramos

  • What is Emilio Alcantara-Ramos's overall allowance rate?
    His allowance rate is 64%, based on 11 disposed (decided) applications—7 allowed and 4 abandoned. This figure is a historical summary and is not a prediction of any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    Emilio Alcantara-Ramos works in one art unit. This pooled record aggregates his outcomes across all units he handles.
  • What does the allowance rate include and exclude?
    The 64% rate counts only decided applications (allowed and abandoned). It excludes pending applications, which have not yet reached final resolution.
  • What technology center is this examiner in?
    He examines applications in TC 2100. The figures on this page reflect his pooled performance across all art units within that technology center.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Emilio Alcantara-Ramos has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 42 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP