Examiner Emilio Alcantara-Ramos has allowed 7 of 11 decided applications (64%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Emilio Alcantara-Ramos maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), covering one art unit. His pooled record spans 42 total applications, of which 11 have been disposed. Among those 11 decided applications, 7 were allowed and 4 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 64% across the disposed count. This allowance rate reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final resolution and does not include pending cases.
A pooled record aggregates data across all art units handled by an examiner. The allowance rate shown—64% here—describes the examiner's historical decided applications and is not a prediction about any specific application. Aggregate figures obscure variations by art unit, subject matter, or case type. The disposed count (11 applications) represents the decided population on which the allowance rate is based; pending applications are excluded from this calculation.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Based on 42 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Emilio Alcantara-Ramos has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 42 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP