LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/EMMANUEL COFFY
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Emmanuel Coffy

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 34 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUL 2006
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Emmanuel Coffy has allowed 12 of 34 decided applications (35%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

35% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Emmanuel Coffy maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 34 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 12 and abandoned 22, yielding an allowance rate of 35% over the decided count. The examiner works within a single art unit. This pooled figure reflects the examiner's aggregate record and does not predict the outcome of any particular application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates the examiner's work across all assigned art units and presents an aggregate allowance rate calculated from decided applications only (allowed plus abandoned). The aggregate rate describes past decisions and is not a prediction of how any specific application will be decided. Pooled figures mask variations across individual art units, which appear separately in detailed breakdowns.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2157
34 APPS · 35% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

35% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 55%
DISPOSITION12 / 22 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION38 moart unit avg 28 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY49.2 moart unit avg 46.6 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Emmanuel Coffy

  • What is Emmanuel Coffy's overall allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 35%, calculated from 12 allowed applications out of 34 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100.
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    This record covers one art unit (2157). The pooled figures aggregate the examiner's overall record across all assigned art units.
  • What does the pooled allowance rate mean for my application?
    The pooled allowance rate describes the examiner's past aggregate record and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual applications are decided on their own merits.
  • How many applications has this examiner decided?
    The examiner has disposed of 34 applications in this record, of which 12 were allowed and 22 were abandoned.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Emmanuel Coffy has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 34 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP