Examiner Emmanuel Lionel Moise has allowed 43 of 51 decided applications (84%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Emmanuel Lionel Moise has a public record across 3 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 51 disposed applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 84%, meaning 43 applications were allowed and 8 were abandoned. This figure is computed from decided cases only and does not include any pending applications. The pooled record spans art units 2133, 2136, and 2137, aggregating outcomes across multiple areas within the technology center.
This pooled record aggregates examination outcomes across multiple art units and technology areas. The overall allowance rate of 84% reflects past dispositions on 51 decided applications and describes the examiner's historical record, not a prediction for any individual case. Pooled figures combine different subject areas and examination contexts, so the aggregate rate may not reflect outcomes in any specific art unit or application type.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Emmanuel Lionel Moise has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 51 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP