LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/EMMANUEL LIONEL MOISE
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Emmanuel Lionel Moise

TECH CENTER 2100 · 3 ART UNITS · 51 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION SEP 2006
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 3 ART UNITS

Examiner Emmanuel Lionel Moise has allowed 43 of 51 decided applications (84%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

84% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2133 · 93%AU 2136 · 78%AU 2137 · 60%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Emmanuel Lionel Moise has a public record across 3 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 51 disposed applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 84%, meaning 43 applications were allowed and 8 were abandoned. This figure is computed from decided cases only and does not include any pending applications. The pooled record spans art units 2133, 2136, and 2137, aggregating outcomes across multiple areas within the technology center.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates examination outcomes across multiple art units and technology areas. The overall allowance rate of 84% reflects past dispositions on 51 decided applications and describes the examiner's historical record, not a prediction for any individual case. Pooled figures combine different subject areas and examination contexts, so the aggregate rate may not reflect outcomes in any specific art unit or application type.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2133
28 APPS · 93% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

93% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 82%
DISPOSITION26 / 2 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION9.4 moart unit avg 22.9 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY19.2 moart unit avg 34.8 mo
ART UNIT 2136
18 APPS · 78% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer.

78% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 60%
DISPOSITION14 / 4 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION20.3 moart unit avg 27.9 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY32.1 moart unit avg 43.4 mo
ART UNIT 2137
5 APPS · 60% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

60% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 68%
DISPOSITION3 / 2 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION13.3 moart unit avg 25.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY29.8 moart unit avg 41.7 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Emmanuel Lionel Moise

  • What is Emmanuel Lionel Moise's overall allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 84%, computed over 51 disposed (decided) applications—43 allowed and 8 abandoned. This is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The examiner has a public record across 3 art units (2133, 2136, 2137) within TC 2100. The figures provided are pooled across all three units and do not break down outcomes by individual art unit.
  • What does the pooled record include?
    The pooled record aggregates 51 disposed applications across multiple art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Pending applications are excluded from the allowance rate calculation.
  • Can this rate predict my application's outcome?
    No. The historical allowance rate describes past decisions and is not a prediction of the outcome of any specific application. Individual applications may present different issues and facts.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Emmanuel Lionel Moise has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 51 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP