Examiner Enamul Md Kabir has allowed 299 of 347 decided applications (86%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Enamul Md Kabir maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning one art unit. Across 347 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 299, yielding an allowance rate of 86%. Of the total 365 applications on record, 48 were abandoned. This pooled figure reflects outcomes across all applications decided in the examiner's art unit over the period covered by the public record.
This pooled record aggregates all applications within the examiner's assigned art units in TC 2100. The allowance rate (86%) and application counts describe historical outcomes, not predictions for any individual application. Pooled data masks variation between specific art units and does not forecast the disposition of a pending or future case. Any application's outcome depends on its specific claims, prior art, and prosecution history.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring, and error-correcting coding/decoding.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 135 decided applications with an interview and 212 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Enamul Md Kabir has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 365 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP