Examiner Eric Charles Wai has allowed 621 of 752 decided applications (83%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Eric Charles Wai maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 1 art unit, he has disposed of 752 applications, of which 621 were allowed. His overall allowance rate stands at 83% of decided applications. The record spans 791 total filings, with 131 abandonment dispositions. This pooled figure aggregates activity across all art units in which he has examined and reflects historical outcomes only.
This pooled record aggregates all art units under which the examiner has examined. The allowance rate is calculated from decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) and does not include pending filings. Aggregate historical figures describe past dispositions and are not predictions about any specific application or art unit. Per-unit breakdowns and individual art-unit rates appear in separate record sections.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 351 decided applications with an interview and 401 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Eric Charles Wai has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 791 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP