Examiner Erich Alexander Fischer has allowed 26 of 36 decided applications (72%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Erich Alexander Fischer maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 36 disposed applications, Fischer allowed 26 and abandoned 10, for an allowance rate of 72%. This record spans a single art unit (2163). The pooled allowance rate reflects outcomes on applications that have been decided; it does not include pending applications and is not predictive of outcomes on any specific future filing.
This examiner's record is pooled across all assigned art units, aggregating disposal data from different areas within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 72% describes past decisions and reflects the historical share of allowed dispositions among decided applications. Aggregate figures describe a completed body of work and are not predictions about individual applications. Per-art-unit breakdowns appear in separate sections of this profile.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Based on 36 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Erich Alexander Fischer has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 36 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP