Examiner Esaw T Abraham has allowed 1,550 of 1,650 decided applications (94%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Esaw T Abraham maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning two art units. Over 1,650 disposed applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 94%, calculated as the share of allowed applications among all decided cases (allowed and abandoned combined). The allowance rate across the examiner's art units ranges from 89% to 94%. This pooled figure aggregates the examiner's work across both art units and describes the historical record without bearing on any individual application's outcome.
A pooled examiner profile combines statistics across multiple art units into a single aggregate record. The overall allowance rate reflects past decisions across all art units the examiner has handled and is not a prediction for any specific application or art unit. The range shown indicates variation among individual art units but does not identify which rate applies to which unit—that detail appears in separate per-art-unit sections. Aggregate figures describe what has occurred, not what will occur.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring, and error-correcting coding/decoding.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 275 decided applications with an interview and 1,227 without.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 37 decided applications with an interview and 111 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Esaw T Abraham has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,695 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP