Examiner Evel Nmn Honore

What the data says.

Examiner Evel Nmn Honore's public record spans Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), covering one art unit. Across 63 total applications, 23 have been decided. Of those 23 disposed applications, 11 were allowed and 12 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 48%. This rate reflects the proportion of decided applications that resulted in allowance over the examiner's pooled record in TC 2100.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all art units under the examiner's jurisdiction and reports historical disposal and allowance data. The 48% allowance rate describes what occurred in past decided cases and is a summary of the examiner's record to date. Aggregate figures do not predict the outcome of any individual application. Each case depends on its own facts, claims, and prosecution history.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

Questions about Examiner Evel Nmn Honore

• 01What is this examiner's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 48%, calculated from 11 allowed applications out of 23 total decided (allowed plus abandoned) applications in the pooled record.
• 02How many art units does this examiner work in?

  Examiner Honore works in one art unit (2142) within TC 2100.
• 03Does the allowance rate predict the outcome of my application?

  No. The allowance rate is a historical summary of decided cases. It is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome, which depends on the unique facts, claims, and evidence in that case.
• 04What is the basis for these statistics?

  These figures are drawn from the examiner's public record of 63 total applications, of which 23 have been disposed (allowed or abandoned). The figures do not include pending applications.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.