Examiner Evral E Bodden has allowed 538 of 730 decided applications (74%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Evral E Bodden maintains a public record of 755 total applications across three art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 730 disposed applications, 538 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 74%. The examiner's allowance rate varies across the three art units, ranging from 39% to 91%. This pooled record represents activity spanning multiple areas within TC 2100 and reflects the aggregate outcome of applications examined across these art units.
This pooled record aggregates activity across multiple art units in TC 2100. The 74% allowance rate describes past outcomes on 730 decided applications and is not a prediction of the outcome for any specific application. The range of 39% to 91% reflects variation among individual art units; the overall figure blends these different allowance rates. Pooled statistics describe historical patterns only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 182 decided applications with an interview and 219 without.
Primarily examines program control and execution, and software engineering.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 117 decided applications with an interview and 146 without.
Primarily examines software engineering.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 32 decided applications with an interview and 34 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Evral E Bodden has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 755 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP