LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/EZRA JAMES BAKER
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Ezra James Baker

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 19 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Ezra James Baker has allowed 10 of 19 decided applications (53%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

53% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Ezra James Baker maintains a public record across Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). The examiner's pooled allowance rate stands at 53% over 19 decided applications (10 allowed, 9 abandoned). This figure represents applications that have received final disposition—either allowed or abandoned—and excludes pending matters. The examiner works within a single art unit, examining a total of 53 applications across the public record. The allowance rate of 53% describes the historical record and does not constitute a prediction for any individual application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates examination activity across all art units assigned to the examiner and reports aggregate figures only. The allowance rate reflects past dispositions and provides context on the examiner's historical record. Pooled statistics combine different art units and may mask variation within individual units. Aggregate figures describe what has occurred and are not predictions of outcomes in any specific application or art unit.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2126
53 APPS · 53% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

53% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 63%
DISPOSITION10 / 9 / 34allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION35.6 moart unit avg 29.4 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY49 moart unit avg 44.4 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility92% · art unit 53%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)52%
§103 — Obviousness100% · art unit 88%
§112 — Written description & definiteness96%
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Ezra James Baker

  • What is Examiner Baker's allowance rate?
    The examiner's pooled allowance rate is 53%, calculated over 19 decided applications (10 allowed and 9 abandoned). This rate is a historical figure and not a prediction of any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    Examiner Baker works within one art unit (2126) in TC 2100. The figures reported here are pooled across that single assignment.
  • What does the pooled allowance rate represent?
    The pooled rate reflects decided applications only—those allowed or abandoned—and excludes pending matters. It aggregates the examiner's record and describes historical dispositions, not future outcomes on any particular application.
  • How many applications has this examiner handled?
    The examiner's total public record includes 53 applications, of which 19 have been decided (10 allowed, 9 abandoned) and the remainder are pending.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Ezra James Baker has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 53 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP