Examiner Faezeh Forouharnejad has allowed 73 of 108 decided applications (68%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Faezeh Forouharnejad maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 134 total applications, 108 applications have been disposed (decided). Of those 108 disposed applications, 73 were allowed and 35 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 68% over the decided count. The examiner's record spans a single art unit. This pooled figure represents historical outcomes across all applications in the examiner's jurisdiction and does not constitute a prediction for any individual application.
This record is pooled across all of the examiner's art units. Aggregate allowance rates describe past outcomes and do not predict the disposition of any specific application. The 68% allowance rate reflects decided applications only (allowed plus abandoned); pending applications are excluded. When reviewing an examiner's record, distinguish between the overall rate and art-unit-specific rates, which appear separately. Aggregate figures provide context for historical performance but remain correlational, not causal.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 68 decided applications with an interview and 40 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Faezeh Forouharnejad has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 134 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP