Examiner Faraz Tima Akbari

What the data says.

Faraz Tima Akbari maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). The examiner's pooled record spans one art unit and covers 48 total applications. Of three disposed applications (allowed plus abandoned), zero were allowed, yielding a 0% allowance rate. Three applications were abandoned. The remainder are pending. This record reflects only decided applications and does not indicate outcomes for applications still under examination.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates the examiner's work across all art units assigned to them. The allowance rate is computed from decided applications only—allowed plus abandoned—and excludes pending filings. Aggregate figures describe historical outcomes and are correlational data, not predictions of the result for any specific application. Individual art-unit records may differ and appear elsewhere on this page.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines program control and execution.

Questions about Examiner Faraz Tima Akbari

• 01What is this examiner's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 0%, based on three decided applications (zero allowed, three abandoned).
• 02How many art units does this examiner work in?

  This examiner works in one art unit within TC 2100.
• 03What does this record cover?

  This is a pooled record across all art units assigned to the examiner. It aggregates 48 total applications; three have been decided (zero allowed, three abandoned). The remainder are pending.
• 04Does the allowance rate predict my application's outcome?

  No. The allowance rate is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any specific application's disposition.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.