Examiner Farhad Agharahimi has allowed 222 of 305 decided applications (73%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Farhad Agharahimi maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 342 total applications, 222 were allowed and 83 abandoned, yielding 305 decided applications. The allowance rate is 73% of those disposed applications. This record spans a single art unit, pooled to reflect the examiner's overall activity. The figures represent historical dispositions and do not forecast outcomes in any pending or future matter.
This record aggregates all dispositions across one art unit within TC 2100. Pooled figures describe past decisions over a defined set of applications and are correlational data, not predictive models for individual cases. An allowance rate reflects the ratio of allowed to decided applications in that historical sample. Aggregate statistics do not indicate how any single application will be examined or decided.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 147 decided applications with an interview and 158 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Farhad Agharahimi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 342 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP