LYNCH·LLP
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Farhad Ali

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 24 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION SEP 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Farhad Ali has allowed 5 of 24 decided applications (21%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

21% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Farhad Ali holds a public record of 24 disposed applications across one art unit in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of those 24 decided applications, 5 were allowed and 19 were abandoned, for an allowance rate of 21%. This rate is calculated as a percentage of all disposed (decided) applications and describes the examiner's historical record in this art unit. The record reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition; it does not include pending applications.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates data from a single art unit and presents the examiner's overall allowance rate across all decided applications in TC 2100. The 21% figure summarizes past dispositions only and does not predict the outcome of any specific application. Aggregate statistics describe historical performance and reflect the mix of applications examined; they are correlational summaries, not causal indicators of how any future application will be examined.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2146
24 APPS · 21% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.

21% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 50%
DISPOSITION5 / 19 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION34.7 moart unit avg 32 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY42.9 moart unit avg 45 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Farhad Ali

  • What is Examiner Farhad Ali's overall allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 21%, calculated from 5 allowed applications out of 24 total disposed applications.
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    This pooled record covers one art unit (2146) within Technology Center 2100.
  • Does the allowance rate predict the outcome of my application?
    No. The 21% rate describes the examiner's historical record on decided applications only. It is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome and does not account for the facts, claims, or prior art specific to any individual case.
  • What does the abandonment figure mean?
    Of the 24 disposed applications, 19 were abandoned. Abandonment includes applications withdrawn by applicants and those closed after final rejection without further action.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Farhad Ali has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 24 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP