Examiner Farid Homayounmehr

What the data says.

Examiner Farid Homayounmehr maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning 2 art units. Over 43 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 16 and abandoned 27, yielding an overall allowance rate of 37%. This figure represents the pooled outcome across both art units in the examiner's portfolio. The record reflects decided cases only; pending applications are excluded from the allowance-rate calculation.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates dispositions across multiple art units within TC 2100. The 37% allowance rate describes the examiner's historical outcomes on decided applications and does not constitute a prediction for any specific application. Pooled figures smooth variations across different art-unit subject matter and prosecution patterns. Individual art-unit records may differ from the aggregate and appear in a separate section of the profile.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

Questions about Examiner Farid Homayounmehr

• 01What is Examiner Homayounmehr's overall allowance rate?

  Over 43 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 16 and abandoned 27, for an allowance rate of 37%.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  The examiner's public record spans 2 art units (2132 and 2139) within TC 2100.
• 03Does this pooled rate apply to my application?

  No. This pooled figure describes historical outcomes across multiple art units and is not a prediction for any individual application. Your application's outcome depends on the specific claims, prior art, and examination of your case.
• 04What technology areas does this examiner handle?

  The examiner works in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.