Examiner Fatima P Mina has allowed 280 of 424 decided applications (66%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Fatima P Mina holds a public record across 3 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 424 decided applications, she allowed 280 and abandoned 144, yielding an allowance rate of 66%. The allowance rate ranges from 66% to 67% across these art units. This pooled figure represents her overall record in TC 2100 and reflects dispositions across all three art units combined.
This pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units, smoothing the variation that exists among them. The overall allowance rate describes past outcomes on decided applications in TC 2100 and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures are useful for understanding an examiner's broad record but do not forecast results in any particular art unit or on any individual case.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 140 decided applications with an interview and 64 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 107 decided applications with an interview and 110 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Fatima P Mina has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 454 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP