Examiner Fazlul Quader has allowed 146 of 266 decided applications (55%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Fazlul Quader maintains a public record spanning 2 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 266 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 146 and abandoned 120, yielding an allowance rate of 55%. This pooled figure reflects decisions made across the full scope of the examiner's art-unit assignment. The record encompasses all closed applications within this technology center and does not include pending matters.
A pooled record aggregates outcomes across multiple art units and reflects historical dispositions only. The allowance rate reported here describes past decisions on applications that reached a final outcome—allowed or abandoned. This aggregate figure does not predict the outcome of any specific application, nor does it account for variation in subject matter or prosecution complexity across individual art units. The data is correlational and historical, not prescriptive.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 74 decided applications with an interview and 189 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Fazlul Quader has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 266 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP